A Sartrean Life

Sartre holds that existence precedes essence. A valet de chambre being is simply what he or she wills to be. Sartre believes that we are defined by what we do. We are what we choose to do. existentialist philosophy is not an easy concept to explain, and Sartre agreed. He summed up existentialism as existence precedes essence. What does that really implicate? Sartre explained it using the analogy of the paper cutter. He said that an mechanic whose inspiration came from a concept make the paper cutter. The artisan referred to the concept of what a paper cutter was and created it with a kn bear method of payoff (part of the concept of the cutter) with a routine.The paper cutter was produced a certain way creating on certain hire for it. Therefore, the essence (the pre- production intent and method of creation) came before the actual existence of the paper cutter, its intent and plan for production was already fancyd. Existentialism is the opposite of this. If it were existential ism, the cutter would leave been created at random without any integrity get bying the intent of it until the artisan determined an intent for the cutter after its production. Following this line of thought, I find myself in a situation where there would be no despair at all because all the hope lies in geniuss self.I define myself and my purpose in my deportment and I then take responsibility for my prize by living out my self-determined purpose. . The supreme virtue of existentialism is ultimate choice. This can only look at been obtained if I am true to myself. I as well have to take responsibility for my ingest actions because I choose my own actions and must live with the consequences. I can choose what I become and have to live with it, but I can change it to create a better fit if I thought my choice wasnt totally correct.Although Sartres philosophy has many advantages and it builds itself on the belief that we create our own choices and we are responsible for ourselv es. I believe that many people will not take the scrap or back out in fear of the responsibility. This occurs because there is no way for the people to know for sure that the choice they make as their definition of themselves is correct. This creates a fear in many people, a fear of being wrong and a fear that being wrong could lead to their demise. Sartre admitted there was practically anguish in taking the existential challenge because there was no way of knowing one was right.Sartres advice to the leery was to be human, stick to ones self, and just hope for the best. This was the point where existentialism neared the thin line amongst philosophy in religion because to take this challenge, people had to have a belief in themselves in order to stick with their choices. Existentialism got much criticism not only because it was mainly atheistic, but also because of the morals it created. Actually, the morals were not created by existentialism, but by existentialists. They created their own morals and values to fall out with choosing their own purposes in life.The meaning of their lives directly paralleled the values elect, in fact Sartre thought that the values chosen is what ones meaning of life was based upon. This idea was strongly criticized by many people because they feared that this could create anarchy. If everyone created their own values, there would be no set laws in which to obey. Sartre stated that ones conscience would be able to determine between right and wrong and that one could tell if their choice of action served an injustice to another person. umteen were very skeptical of this, however fearing that, for example, backing out of an agreement was acceptable to some, but would not be acceptable to others. In conclusion, despite the large amount of criticism, Sartre was widely followed and looked upon highly by many. He could stand up his ideas with reason and logic. These ideas appealed to large amounts of people because of the circumstan ces they were in. The timing of Sartre was part of what created such a large following. end-to-end history, change and the following of new and sometimes radical ideas came right after a large misadventure in which people were left in despair looking for hope. If there is one thing to call back about existentialism it is that existence precedes essence. If one is an existentialist or not one gets out of life what one puts in the meaning of our lives comes not from what happens in our lives, but what we do in them and every one of us are actors on the stage of life. In closing, Sartre said it best when he commented, Man is encompassed by his own existence and there is no exit.